PAPER SAID, We have to remember that we are very much dependent on the Filipinos around us.We could die a slow death if they chose to leave us.
I'm became a handicapped and shut my establishment after my Filipino workers insisted to back homeland.When they left, I felt as if Ihad lost my arms,I was so sad that I lost my appetite.
Nobody here can think of a life w/out Filipinos, who make up around 20% of the world seafarers.there are 1.2 million Filipinos sailors. So if filipinos decided one day to stop working or go to strike for any reason, who would transport our oil, food and heavy equipment across the world? We can only imagine the disaster that would happen. What makes filipno unique is ability to communicate and technical training the received in the early stages of their education because theijr are several specialized training institute in the philippines which are Europian %26amp; american Standard in combination.This type of education system is very effective.ME news paper, local press head line. 'IMAGINE A WORLD W/OUT FILIPINOS' dated 16.6.08, Is it true or false?
All the stuff you said is true to quite some extent. But for many Filipinos, these do not necessarily materialize into the much needed cash. Filipino workers worldwide remain the most highly exploited. The employer who felt his arms and legs were amputated after his/ her Filipino worker left, will not get replacements for the peanuts they pay under the name of a salary. Nor will he get workers who will stay in such pitiable conditions they subject Filipinos to.
By an ME newspaper, I assume you mean a Middle East-based newspaper. Can you ask this enlightened newspaper...has it ever brought to light, through its reports, the overall plight of the Filipino worker in that region???
BTW..which newspaper was that??? I would like to give them a piece of my mind.ME news paper, local press head line. 'IMAGINE A WORLD W/OUT FILIPINOS' dated 16.6.08, Is it true or false?
True. As Filipino's can be literally found almost everywhere and make up almost 20% of a country's population of workers I'd say that the Filipino's could affect certain countries' business. Now if only those people would come back to Philippines and do some work here and there ...... The Philippines can PROBABLY progress to some point ...
It is true and I agree with both answerers above.
Here are links to the complete news write-up and some comments from Qatar based Filipinos.
http://www.arabnews.com/?page=13%26amp;section鈥?/a>
http://www.qatarliving.com/node/121833
True!
But then if there are no Filipinos, surely there would be another who will be just like us.
I must say kitty cathleen is correct.
Perhaps, the paper you mentioned is a prophecy.
That a ';mass layoff'; is in the offing. I feel it in my bones, too. They're gonna fire us all cuz my company is heading down dangerous straits! Poor me! Alas! Heading back home as a ';bum'; again!
Am working in the Middle East, and my company used to have a 70% Filipino work force. Now, there's only a handful of us left. We were replaced by Bangla Deshis, Pakistanis, etc. etc. And our great Plant %26amp; Machinery department, that was the pride of the land, maintained by Filipinos, became a great junkyard when my countrymen left.
Way back then (a LONG time ago),
1 Philippine peso (P) is equivalent to 1 US dollar ($).
If only our politicians did not corrupt our money,
(ESPECIALLY the MARCOSes --including GMA)
This place could have already been a 1st World Country.
(I think it became / almost became a 1st World Country)
It's an honest and undeniable fact.
Even you alone KNOW exactly how great we,
the Filipino people are.
You know what?
We have the brains, the skills, and the resources.
We just LACK honest and dedicated leaders..
Who will govern our Prosperous Land.
Sunday, February 7, 2010
ME news paper, local press head line. 'IMAGINE A WORLD W/OUT FILIPINOS' dated 16.6.08, Is it true or false?
PAPER SAID, We have to remember that we are very much dependent on the Filipinos around us.We could die a slow death if they chose to leave us.
I'm became a handicapped and shut my establishment after my Filipino workers insisted to back homeland.When they left, I felt as if Ihad lost my arms,I was so sad that I lost my appetite.
Nobody here can think of a life w/out Filipinos, who make up around 20% of the world seafarers.there are 1.2 million Filipinos sailors. So if filipinos decided one day to stop working or go to strike for any reason, who would transport our oil, food and heavy equipment across the world? We can only imagine the disaster that would happen. What makes filipno unique is ability to communicate and technical training the received in the early stages of their education because theijr are several specialized training institute in the philippines which are Europian %26amp; american Standard in combination.This type of education system is very effective.ME news paper, local press head line. 'IMAGINE A WORLD W/OUT FILIPINOS' dated 16.6.08, Is it true or false?
Some people think of Filipinos very lowly, with a big percentage of them doing the manual labor jobs, but I think Filipinos should be proud of their fellowmen because they are strong, as much as it pains them to, they leave their family to work abroad, to give them a better life, e.g. sailors. The babysitters/maids/domestic helpers are also something for Filipinos to be proud of. Most people would be ashamed to admit that his/her mother is a domestic helper/maid/babysitter but just like what my dad told me, you have to agree that the other people aren't capable of handling their own children and they trust them (filipinos) their children.
The filipinos are not afraid to learn, to strive and give it their all.ME news paper, local press head line. 'IMAGINE A WORLD W/OUT FILIPINOS' dated 16.6.08, Is it true or false?
Don't worry much about it, they can always be replaced with Chinese, or Bangladeshi, or Indians, and or Sri Lankan and Nepalis. The truth is that any nationality can be as reliable as the Filipinos just give them the training and education and eventually they will learn. Though it maybe will take some time because of the communication gap.
IM PROUD TO BE FILIPINO!!!
im glad that katia said that we're not afraid to learn anything...
all of us pinoys are really trying our best in all our work.... JUst like my mom __ one reason she left the philippines cuz she wanted to live a beter life in help the family
I'm became a handicapped and shut my establishment after my Filipino workers insisted to back homeland.When they left, I felt as if Ihad lost my arms,I was so sad that I lost my appetite.
Nobody here can think of a life w/out Filipinos, who make up around 20% of the world seafarers.there are 1.2 million Filipinos sailors. So if filipinos decided one day to stop working or go to strike for any reason, who would transport our oil, food and heavy equipment across the world? We can only imagine the disaster that would happen. What makes filipno unique is ability to communicate and technical training the received in the early stages of their education because theijr are several specialized training institute in the philippines which are Europian %26amp; american Standard in combination.This type of education system is very effective.ME news paper, local press head line. 'IMAGINE A WORLD W/OUT FILIPINOS' dated 16.6.08, Is it true or false?
Some people think of Filipinos very lowly, with a big percentage of them doing the manual labor jobs, but I think Filipinos should be proud of their fellowmen because they are strong, as much as it pains them to, they leave their family to work abroad, to give them a better life, e.g. sailors. The babysitters/maids/domestic helpers are also something for Filipinos to be proud of. Most people would be ashamed to admit that his/her mother is a domestic helper/maid/babysitter but just like what my dad told me, you have to agree that the other people aren't capable of handling their own children and they trust them (filipinos) their children.
The filipinos are not afraid to learn, to strive and give it their all.ME news paper, local press head line. 'IMAGINE A WORLD W/OUT FILIPINOS' dated 16.6.08, Is it true or false?
Don't worry much about it, they can always be replaced with Chinese, or Bangladeshi, or Indians, and or Sri Lankan and Nepalis. The truth is that any nationality can be as reliable as the Filipinos just give them the training and education and eventually they will learn. Though it maybe will take some time because of the communication gap.
IM PROUD TO BE FILIPINO!!!
im glad that katia said that we're not afraid to learn anything...
all of us pinoys are really trying our best in all our work.... JUst like my mom __ one reason she left the philippines cuz she wanted to live a beter life in help the family
How can i prove a false document the story is that my landlord made sign a paper saying i gave him back the..?
the keys to the apt now when i signed this paper it was January 8th 2009 and as of than he took rent all the way in till june 11th all of my things were thrown out and this paper came out which my signature had been photo copied on to this paper and now says i released the keys to him on may 20 what can i do?? also when i signed this paper he had a pistol on his hip and a baseball bat on his desk also he said if i didnt sign it he was goin to throw me and my family out that weekHow can i prove a false document the story is that my landlord made sign a paper saying i gave him back the..?
If the only copy of this paper is a photocopy and he doesn't have the original, signed and dated by you, then you tell the judge that you did not sign it and that it is a fake.
Copies are usually not good enough in court.
If the only copy of this paper is a photocopy and he doesn't have the original, signed and dated by you, then you tell the judge that you did not sign it and that it is a fake.
Copies are usually not good enough in court.
True or False: You have your significant other, family or pet as your desktop wall paper or screen saver?
If true, share your experience please.True or False: You have your significant other, family or pet as your desktop wall paper or screen saver?
I have a picture of my sisters and I, at Christmas, sitting on a sofa, all making funny faces. I love it and it's silly.True or False: You have your significant other, family or pet as your desktop wall paper or screen saver?
I have used my children as wallpaper many times. I have one pic of them with a snowman that was absolutely awesome.
Right now though, I have German soldiers on weapons carrier during a parade, for reasons which escape me at the moment.
true i have a picture of my son as my wall paper
False
False, it's the mexico sunset from my honeymoon last October. Before that it was the shark from Strange Wilderness, Then it was my cat.
False
I have varying photos of landmarkswindows web hosting
I have a picture of my sisters and I, at Christmas, sitting on a sofa, all making funny faces. I love it and it's silly.True or False: You have your significant other, family or pet as your desktop wall paper or screen saver?
I have used my children as wallpaper many times. I have one pic of them with a snowman that was absolutely awesome.
Right now though, I have German soldiers on weapons carrier during a parade, for reasons which escape me at the moment.
true i have a picture of my son as my wall paper
False
False, it's the mexico sunset from my honeymoon last October. Before that it was the shark from Strange Wilderness, Then it was my cat.
False
I have varying photos of landmarks
What is the probable outcome suing for false arrest when your name makes the paper for indictment?
I was asked by an officer in a restaurant if I was carring a handgun (someone must have overheard a conversation about me getting a license to carry) and I said I was carrying a licensed handgun. He told me I was under arrest for unlawful carrying on licensed premise (where alcohol is served). We walked past a sign in the restaurant on the way to the police car that said ';The unlicensed possession of a handgun is illegal'; meaning that a licensed handgun is perfectly legal. When I told him that he didn't listen and then asked if I was going to try to give him trouble, so I shut up and went to jail. Even though I had a lawyer the grand jury still indicted me because the ADA never believed it was legal either. The owner of the place where I was arrested called the DA's office and told them it was not illegal but they didn't believe him! Weird! They have since dismissed it but damage is done. What can I expect in terms of compensation in Texas? I am a self employed professional.What is the probable outcome suing for false arrest when your name makes the paper for indictment?
if the officers arrested you in the normal police procedures there is nothing you can sue for.the law about carrying in a place that serves alcohol is not up to the manager.he does not have the choice to choose.so with that i see some holes in your story that makes it unbelievable.
--------retired texas deputy sheriff--------What is the probable outcome suing for false arrest when your name makes the paper for indictment?
No compensation! It is illegal to carry a handgun on premises where alcohol is served. Just because the sign said it was ok, doesn't make it true or the law. I don't believe that a grand jury was used for that offense either. A concealed permit doesn't give you the right to carry the gun anywhere you please. There are several places where it is illegal to carry a gun even with a permit. Just because a charge is dropped, doesn't mean that you were arrested falsely.
I doubt it. You were arrested because the officer reasonably believed you comitted a crime. You were indicted by a grand jury based on the arrest and the ADA's preserntation of the case to the GJ. The mistake was fixed when the charges were dropped.
Write a letter to the editor of the paper. Perhaps they will publish it and you will have your fair response published. But the public who read it may just think you are whining.
But I have to ask: just what damage has been done to you?
if the officers arrested you in the normal police procedures there is nothing you can sue for.the law about carrying in a place that serves alcohol is not up to the manager.he does not have the choice to choose.so with that i see some holes in your story that makes it unbelievable.
--------retired texas deputy sheriff--------What is the probable outcome suing for false arrest when your name makes the paper for indictment?
No compensation! It is illegal to carry a handgun on premises where alcohol is served. Just because the sign said it was ok, doesn't make it true or the law. I don't believe that a grand jury was used for that offense either. A concealed permit doesn't give you the right to carry the gun anywhere you please. There are several places where it is illegal to carry a gun even with a permit. Just because a charge is dropped, doesn't mean that you were arrested falsely.
I doubt it. You were arrested because the officer reasonably believed you comitted a crime. You were indicted by a grand jury based on the arrest and the ADA's preserntation of the case to the GJ. The mistake was fixed when the charges were dropped.
Write a letter to the editor of the paper. Perhaps they will publish it and you will have your fair response published. But the public who read it may just think you are whining.
But I have to ask: just what damage has been done to you?
True or False: Marriage is just a good waste of paper and ink?
Try a woman next time around, you can do it now in your home state!True or False: Marriage is just a good waste of paper and ink?
Interesting.... a contradiction... a ';good';... ';waste';... hmmm.
actually, marriage still has several good reasons to be around... on the spiritual level, it and the ceremony serve as a means of bonding... it is a commitment before family, friends and God. Marriage also serves as a legally binding union which emparts both rights, responsibilities and privileges.
So a ';good waste of paper and ink?'; I don't think so... a good marriage is a great thing!!! making on so, is the hard part.True or False: Marriage is just a good waste of paper and ink?
Wow. Marriage is one of the bricks in the foundation of our society. When it works we all benefit greatly and yes there are many problems but I fell they could be solved. Just think, we do not teach at all in the school how to have a good marriage. What if we did. Marriage can be a great institution. So it is not a waste of paper.
True. Why do you need a piece of paper to tell you how to feel? All marriage does is put you into a different tax bracket. I dont think you need a ceremony, or ring, or paper or someone that says they work with/for god and god wants you to marry or you go to hell. Just be happy with each other and live good lives. That's true marriage.
Neither. When you have two people that really want to work on their marriage and truely care for one another than it is not a waste. When you have 1 person who could care less what they do to their family than it is a waste. A waste of heart, feelings and genuine care for another human being.
False...For me my marriage and husband mean everything to me.
Whatever it means to you is right for you....it is the ceremony of the hearts joining that counts...it could be down by a pond with just the two of you present....
Wow - you are one bitter lonely cat herder.
This is like your 19th man-hating question in 4 minutes.
false.. for me its worth all the hard time we go through. we have a perfect family now.. thank God for this!
Interesting.... a contradiction... a ';good';... ';waste';... hmmm.
actually, marriage still has several good reasons to be around... on the spiritual level, it and the ceremony serve as a means of bonding... it is a commitment before family, friends and God. Marriage also serves as a legally binding union which emparts both rights, responsibilities and privileges.
So a ';good waste of paper and ink?'; I don't think so... a good marriage is a great thing!!! making on so, is the hard part.True or False: Marriage is just a good waste of paper and ink?
Wow. Marriage is one of the bricks in the foundation of our society. When it works we all benefit greatly and yes there are many problems but I fell they could be solved. Just think, we do not teach at all in the school how to have a good marriage. What if we did. Marriage can be a great institution. So it is not a waste of paper.
True. Why do you need a piece of paper to tell you how to feel? All marriage does is put you into a different tax bracket. I dont think you need a ceremony, or ring, or paper or someone that says they work with/for god and god wants you to marry or you go to hell. Just be happy with each other and live good lives. That's true marriage.
Neither. When you have two people that really want to work on their marriage and truely care for one another than it is not a waste. When you have 1 person who could care less what they do to their family than it is a waste. A waste of heart, feelings and genuine care for another human being.
False...For me my marriage and husband mean everything to me.
Whatever it means to you is right for you....it is the ceremony of the hearts joining that counts...it could be down by a pond with just the two of you present....
Wow - you are one bitter lonely cat herder.
This is like your 19th man-hating question in 4 minutes.
false.. for me its worth all the hard time we go through. we have a perfect family now.. thank God for this!
Bible: true-false real-fake real-hoax. is bible really word of God or paper with ink.?
what's the real truth?Bible: true-false real-fake real-hoax. is bible really word of God or paper with ink.?
Jesus is the real Truth.
';Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, THE TRUTH, and the life: ...';
(John 14:6)Bible: true-false real-fake real-hoax. is bible really word of God or paper with ink.?
';All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness.';
(2 Tim. 3:16 NASB)
All Scripture is God-breathed, given by His inspiration. The Word of God is not just a book or a compilation of man's thoughts or philosophy. God inspired holy men to write the scripture passages and He takes full responsibility for their validity.
God's Word has been given for teaching and helping people, for correcting and guiding them. The Scriptures show us how to live. Maybe we should know them better.
The Message Bible says: ';Every part of Scripture is God-breathed and useful one way or another鈥攕howing us truth, exposing our rebellion, correcting our mistakes, training us to live God's way.';
The Bible is the true Word of God. We can see this through science that is written in it, the test of time --- how it was never changed (See Dead Sea Scrolls for proof), and thousands of predictions that came or are coming true.
For more information check out my sources before.
The Bible has stood during the tests that people put on it from the beginning. Written by 44 men over the span of 1400+ years. No contradictions from beg. to end. The message is the same from beginning to end. God promised his Word to last forever. If it is true then there must be a true version alive today. Based on His promise, if we believe, we should be able to prove the correct Bible by its doctrine and symmetry of doctrine.
Acts 12:24 But the WORD OF GOD continued to increase and spread.
Luke 11:28 Blessed rather are those who hear the WORD OF GOD and obey it.
2 Corinthians 2:17 Unlike so many, we do not peddle the WORD OF GOD, for profit. On the contrary, in christ we speak before God with sincerity, like men sent from God.
1 Thessalonians 2:13 And we also thank God continually because when you received the WORD OF GOD, which you heard from us, you accepted it not as the word of men, but as it actually is, the WORD OF GOD, which is at work in you who believe.
The WORD OF GOD is TRUE and REAL.
Blessings to you !!! In Christ, Me !!
Have you read it? I will guess you haven't (and I mean the whole thing), because if you did, you'd know the answer. Why ask for other people's opinions? You'll get as many opinions as answers. You have a mind, so don't depend on something this important to other opinions. Read it and make your own.
A dependable bible that is easy to read is The New Jerusalem Bible.
is this hoax???
please compare this parables
[Quran --%26gt;Al-HASYR 59:21] Had We sent down this Qur'an on a mountain, verily, thou wouldst have seen it humble itself and cleave asunder for fear of Allah. Such are the similitudes which We propound to men, that they may reflect.
is that verse proven? of course not.
[Bible --%26gt;MATTEW 17:20]And He said to them, ';Because of the littleness of your faith; for truly I say to you, if you have faith the size of a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, 'Move from here to there,' and it will move; and nothing will be impossible to you.
it's had happened in Mokattam Mountain - Egypt
http://theotokia.org/id7.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_the_T鈥?/a>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Cop鈥?/a>
http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/鈥?/a>
http://www.amazon.com/story-Copts-Iris-H鈥?/a>
marcopolo confirm the story
http://www.newmiracles.org/mokatam.htm
http://www.placestudies.com/page/travel-鈥?/a>
Praise Jesus forever
It's just a way for the Church to control people. It was written in the Middle Ages by the Church to keep everyone from leaving the Church when things got bad. And they could keep gathering tithes and making money.
Some powerful men put together some stories so that they could control the common people easier.
Men wrote what they believed.
YES.
Jesus is the real Truth.
';Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, THE TRUTH, and the life: ...';
(John 14:6)Bible: true-false real-fake real-hoax. is bible really word of God or paper with ink.?
';All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness.';
(2 Tim. 3:16 NASB)
All Scripture is God-breathed, given by His inspiration. The Word of God is not just a book or a compilation of man's thoughts or philosophy. God inspired holy men to write the scripture passages and He takes full responsibility for their validity.
God's Word has been given for teaching and helping people, for correcting and guiding them. The Scriptures show us how to live. Maybe we should know them better.
The Message Bible says: ';Every part of Scripture is God-breathed and useful one way or another鈥攕howing us truth, exposing our rebellion, correcting our mistakes, training us to live God's way.';
The Bible is the true Word of God. We can see this through science that is written in it, the test of time --- how it was never changed (See Dead Sea Scrolls for proof), and thousands of predictions that came or are coming true.
For more information check out my sources before.
The Bible has stood during the tests that people put on it from the beginning. Written by 44 men over the span of 1400+ years. No contradictions from beg. to end. The message is the same from beginning to end. God promised his Word to last forever. If it is true then there must be a true version alive today. Based on His promise, if we believe, we should be able to prove the correct Bible by its doctrine and symmetry of doctrine.
Acts 12:24 But the WORD OF GOD continued to increase and spread.
Luke 11:28 Blessed rather are those who hear the WORD OF GOD and obey it.
2 Corinthians 2:17 Unlike so many, we do not peddle the WORD OF GOD, for profit. On the contrary, in christ we speak before God with sincerity, like men sent from God.
1 Thessalonians 2:13 And we also thank God continually because when you received the WORD OF GOD, which you heard from us, you accepted it not as the word of men, but as it actually is, the WORD OF GOD, which is at work in you who believe.
The WORD OF GOD is TRUE and REAL.
Blessings to you !!! In Christ, Me !!
Have you read it? I will guess you haven't (and I mean the whole thing), because if you did, you'd know the answer. Why ask for other people's opinions? You'll get as many opinions as answers. You have a mind, so don't depend on something this important to other opinions. Read it and make your own.
A dependable bible that is easy to read is The New Jerusalem Bible.
is this hoax???
please compare this parables
[Quran --%26gt;Al-HASYR 59:21] Had We sent down this Qur'an on a mountain, verily, thou wouldst have seen it humble itself and cleave asunder for fear of Allah. Such are the similitudes which We propound to men, that they may reflect.
is that verse proven? of course not.
[Bible --%26gt;MATTEW 17:20]And He said to them, ';Because of the littleness of your faith; for truly I say to you, if you have faith the size of a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, 'Move from here to there,' and it will move; and nothing will be impossible to you.
it's had happened in Mokattam Mountain - Egypt
http://theotokia.org/id7.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_the_T鈥?/a>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Cop鈥?/a>
http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/鈥?/a>
http://www.amazon.com/story-Copts-Iris-H鈥?/a>
marcopolo confirm the story
http://www.newmiracles.org/mokatam.htm
http://www.placestudies.com/page/travel-鈥?/a>
Praise Jesus forever
It's just a way for the Church to control people. It was written in the Middle Ages by the Church to keep everyone from leaving the Church when things got bad. And they could keep gathering tithes and making money.
Some powerful men put together some stories so that they could control the common people easier.
Men wrote what they believed.
YES.
True or false Marriage is just a piece of paper??
Yes.
If a couple really loves eachother, then they do not need a piece of paper to clarify that.
The only thing that, that piece of paper is good for is benefits and stuff of that nature...True or false Marriage is just a piece of paper??
Way false!!!! If you got married for the right reasons (love, security, friendship, mutual life goals and ideals) than there is soooo much more to marriage than the license and tax benefits!True or false Marriage is just a piece of paper??
false
I used to think that
marriage is a religious ceremony with illegally granted federal benefits.
its a corrupt system put in place by a government having incestuous relations with the church while saying it has separation.
False
I say false, I think it's a declaration and celebration with and in front of all of the people you know and care about.
TRUE. I think that marriage is nothing but a piece of paper. I have been living with my boyfriend for years now and it feels like we are married. We love each other so much, in our hearts we are married, and don't need that silly piece of paper.
False, it's more than just a piece of paper. Marriage is a unity with that 1 special person, it's a devine committment to another person who makes you whole and above all being marriage is a true richness of life.
false........
True.
Edit: Beth, 3 down took the words right out of my mouth. I've been living with my boyfriend for eight years and in our hearts we are married. We do everything married couples do. We have a monogamous commitment. He's my true love and I'm his. We are living proof that marriage is just a piece of paper.
FALSE!!
Marriage is a commitment and a bond between a couple....:)
love! :)
False.
I think it depends on how the couple is.
Marriage is what you make of it.
False. Your children will be legitimate (although most people don't seem to care about that any more.) You can be put on your husband's insurance. And after a month or two, you can see the REAL person that you married.
well its an exspensive bit of paper lol
false
False. If you believe that please do not get married.
false
depends on the people.
Well some of us have the luck to be false(like me) but some have the bad luck to be true... *sigh*
False, its a piece of paper with legal signatures on it.
false
true.
False
true,because if you really do love,care,and respect a person that's all you need and weather you have a piece of paper saying that it is OK to do this it should not matter if you have that paper or not.
definitley FALSE . marriage is a sign of true love!!! arranged marriage wthout love is wrong!!!
false, it's so much more than that!!
My wife and I have been together 28 years, we both feel it just a piece of paper. What's really important is the relationship behind that piece of paper.
In the eyes of the state marriage is a contract and society does provide some real benefits to married couples. (so it a piece of paper with benefits)
You and your spouse have a great deal of freedom to customize a marriage as long as you both agree. That's usually the big problem in marriage, you have two individuals fighting for control, ignorant about their partner and pumped up on a load of unreal expectations.
Like any contract, civil, holy or personal -its strength is based on knowledge and good faith. Any contract that lacks either is destine to failure.
False. Boiling down marriage as ';just a piece of paper'; is usually advantageous for a person phrasing it that way...........
This day and age-True
If a couple really loves eachother, then they do not need a piece of paper to clarify that.
The only thing that, that piece of paper is good for is benefits and stuff of that nature...True or false Marriage is just a piece of paper??
Way false!!!! If you got married for the right reasons (love, security, friendship, mutual life goals and ideals) than there is soooo much more to marriage than the license and tax benefits!True or false Marriage is just a piece of paper??
false
I used to think that
marriage is a religious ceremony with illegally granted federal benefits.
its a corrupt system put in place by a government having incestuous relations with the church while saying it has separation.
False
I say false, I think it's a declaration and celebration with and in front of all of the people you know and care about.
TRUE. I think that marriage is nothing but a piece of paper. I have been living with my boyfriend for years now and it feels like we are married. We love each other so much, in our hearts we are married, and don't need that silly piece of paper.
False, it's more than just a piece of paper. Marriage is a unity with that 1 special person, it's a devine committment to another person who makes you whole and above all being marriage is a true richness of life.
false........
True.
Edit: Beth, 3 down took the words right out of my mouth. I've been living with my boyfriend for eight years and in our hearts we are married. We do everything married couples do. We have a monogamous commitment. He's my true love and I'm his. We are living proof that marriage is just a piece of paper.
FALSE!!
Marriage is a commitment and a bond between a couple....:)
love! :)
False.
I think it depends on how the couple is.
Marriage is what you make of it.
False. Your children will be legitimate (although most people don't seem to care about that any more.) You can be put on your husband's insurance. And after a month or two, you can see the REAL person that you married.
well its an exspensive bit of paper lol
false
False. If you believe that please do not get married.
false
depends on the people.
Well some of us have the luck to be false(like me) but some have the bad luck to be true... *sigh*
False, its a piece of paper with legal signatures on it.
false
true.
False
true,because if you really do love,care,and respect a person that's all you need and weather you have a piece of paper saying that it is OK to do this it should not matter if you have that paper or not.
definitley FALSE . marriage is a sign of true love!!! arranged marriage wthout love is wrong!!!
false, it's so much more than that!!
My wife and I have been together 28 years, we both feel it just a piece of paper. What's really important is the relationship behind that piece of paper.
In the eyes of the state marriage is a contract and society does provide some real benefits to married couples. (so it a piece of paper with benefits)
You and your spouse have a great deal of freedom to customize a marriage as long as you both agree. That's usually the big problem in marriage, you have two individuals fighting for control, ignorant about their partner and pumped up on a load of unreal expectations.
Like any contract, civil, holy or personal -its strength is based on knowledge and good faith. Any contract that lacks either is destine to failure.
False. Boiling down marriage as ';just a piece of paper'; is usually advantageous for a person phrasing it that way...........
This day and age-True
History paper question, Aqueducts and sewers were essential in helping Roman cities grow. True? False?
true
it help flow clean water into the city and dirty water into a seperaqte areaHistory paper question, Aqueducts and sewers were essential in helping Roman cities grow. True? False?
False!! Who needs clean water!!
Lol, the answer is true, of course.History paper question, Aqueducts and sewers were essential in helping Roman cities grow. True? False?
true duh....
true
darn right they were.windows web hosting
it help flow clean water into the city and dirty water into a seperaqte areaHistory paper question, Aqueducts and sewers were essential in helping Roman cities grow. True? False?
False!! Who needs clean water!!
Lol, the answer is true, of course.History paper question, Aqueducts and sewers were essential in helping Roman cities grow. True? False?
true duh....
true
darn right they were.
If creationism is false, then why has NO scientific paper ever disputed it?!?
It's simply a fact that there has never been a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that has disputed or argued against any creationist claim. Doesn't that prove that creationism is scientific?If creationism is false, then why has NO scientific paper ever disputed it?!?
It's simply a fact that there has never been a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that has argued for any creationist claim. Doesn't that prove that creationism is unscientific?If creationism is false, then why has NO scientific paper ever disputed it?!?
You need to get to more libraries, methinks. Bible as scientific publication = non sequitur. There’s so many good scientific ones out there that your comment is a slight on all science - it's akin to me calling Darwin’s “Origins” a more important *religious work* than the Bible. Do you see that?
The Bible is only one of many religious books written by humans. The fact that believers need a ';scientific prove'; for their content, is merely an indication of the weakness in their faith.
No one serious scientist can argue with a myth that claims, against every evidence, that the world was created when the Jews start counting the time.
there has never been a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that has disputed or argued against the existence of dragons either...
No. Scientists have better things to write papers on. Like stuff they can collect real, tangible evidence for.
I looked up the scientific method on the Internet for you:
Scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena and acquiring new knowledge, as well as for correcting and integrating previous knowledge. It is based on gathering observable, empirical, measurable evidence, subject to specific principles of reasoning.
No. It just proves that science doesn't have a problem with religion. No one is trying to disprove your god. It's the religious fanatics who put that in peoples head.
Really? Now I see why the United States is declining when someone would ask such as stupid red herring question. CREATIONISM IS NONSENSE GET OVER IT!!!
Creationism has been shown for the fraud it is over and over again.
The United States National Academy of Sciences has stated ';the claims of creation science lack empirical support and cannot be meaningfully tested. These observations lead to two fundamental conclusions: the teaching of evolution should be an integral part of science instruction, and creation science is in fact not science and should not be presented as such in science classes.';[4] and ';Creationism, intelligent design, and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science.';[5] It is viewed as a pseudoscience that does not conform to the scientific method; there are admissions by its proponents that the means of creation cannot be proven.[6] Creation science literature generally consists of compilations of alleged weaknesses in current models of evolution and geology.';
';If creationism is false, then why has NO scientific paper ever disputed it?!?';
Because it is not worth the time of any credible scientist. It's just not a valid theory worth discussing.
Oh stop it. Nobody's THIS stupid.
Because any scientist with the brains of a gnat knows that it useless, and speaking against it in a professional journal would be a complete waste of time. If you want to argue that creationism is scientific, show some effect that it predicts which can be tested by some means. Which would be a challenge, since it can be proven that creationism can predict nothing. You cannot bake a cake if one of the recipe steps is ';Then a miracle happens!';. By the way, evolution is now a proven fact (details on request).
I don't know.... maybe science has better things to do, like finding cures for aids, cancer, leukemia... maybe science is more concerned with prolonging human life rather than the origins of it.
And, no, it doesn't prove that something claimed in a book is scientific. Creationism is just that - something someone claimed. In a book.
No-one needs to argue against creationism; the onus is upon Creationists to prove their position, not the other way around.
';Creationism'; is based on a religious story. It presumes there is a particular god who created the world.. coming to the answer before asking the particular question. The Biblical story of creation is as valid as any of the other thousands of creation stories.
Because it's not falsifiable, which is why it's not a scientific theory in the first place, which is why it has no place in scientific publications.
wait for it
wait for it
wait for it
almost there
Farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrtttt
ahhh.... Great question.
............why even bother anymore?(rolls eyes) *sigh*
There has never been a Creationist claim that had sufficient merit to be tested. It is not scientific because it cannot be tested by predictions it makes.
Creationism is unscientific because it posits a being whose one-time or continued action cannot be reproduced, observed or measured. Science is mostly concerned with observable, measurable or reproducible phenomena which are capable of rational explanation. This is why scientists do not usually bother with ghosts, magic, ESP or ';alien abduction';. None of them are reproducible.
And here's a question for creationists, ';What/who created the creator?'; And who or what created that creator?
Your contention that there has never been a scientific paper disputing creationism is probably erroneous. Creationists do not read the scientific literature, by and large, so they would probably not know. Millions of papers have been published since the 17th century. No-one can read them all.
Someone in a recent court case had to admit he had not read some immunology papers which had been advanced as evidence.
Many scientific papers implicity (but not explicitly) deny some aspects of creationism. However, whether there have been explicit papers or not, scientists from disciplines as diverse as biology and geology have written books disputing the validity of creationism or the truthfulness of several prominent creationists. I cite ';Telling Lies for God'; by geologist Professor Ian Plimer and ';The God Delusion'; by biologist Professor Richard Dawkins.
As far as scientific papers are concerned, scientists have better things to do with their time than to bandy words with what they see as a silly or moronic religious minority. And as a DNA and genetics expert said recently, creationists go for soft targets like school boards and school teachers, not practicing scientists. Practicing scientists generally are too difficult for creationists because they are able to expose the whole mass of error, misinformation and straight out lies that creationism is.
No - not in the least. Creationism is based on a book that could well have been a work of collective fiction during its time and instead has been misunderstood and misused as fact.
The idea of having to teach this so called ';theory'; has been discussed in many scholarly and scientific publications, however.
I am sure there are scientific papers out there disputing creationism. Check out wikipedia's take:
The claim that Creation science is a valid science is disputed. The worldwide scientific community overwhelmingly supports the position that creation science is not a valid science. The United States National Academy of Sciences has stated ';the claims of creation science lack empirical support and cannot be meaningfully tested. These observations lead to two fundamental conclusions: the teaching of evolution should be an integral part of science instruction, and creation science is in fact not science and should not be presented as such in science classes.';[4] and ';Creationism, intelligent design, and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science.';[5] It is viewed as a pseudoscience that does not conform to the scientific method; there are admissions by its proponents that the means of creation cannot be proven.[6] Creation science literature generally consists of compilations of alleged weaknesses in current models of evolution and geology.[
I am a creationist. I'd like to think I'm rational and intelligent. My way of ACCEPTING creationism is this: I consider the Bible to be the word of God, and therefore infallible. I consider scientific ';papers'; and ';theories'; to be the work of mankind, and therefore quite fallible. So there.
Like mentioned by most people, creationism is not a scientific theory thus not for science to talk about. If you want to read theories on the existence of god, which it what creationism relies on, then check of philosophy. There are many philosophical publications on the subject for both the existence of god and the nonexistence of god.
One thing to watch out for with philosophy is that some people love it and others hate it. There is valid reasons for the feeling on both sides, so if someone doesn't like philosophy, I recommend not trying to force them into a debate.
Many have tried to dispel what, for the sake of argument, I will call the ';theory of creationism.'; It is disputed, much like evolution. But if creation could be ';proved'; by human standards, faith would be without effect. For scientific theory to become a law, it has to be tested in a controlled environment. That can't be done with evolution or creation. BTW, I'm a creationist.
I dont belive in creationism....but damn Science dosnt kno ******* everything. Einstein said it best 'religoin without science is blind, and science witout religion is lame' Why dosnt science explain why the universe decided to appear one day somehow from 'nothingness'. So it was the big bang....but was does that really esplain...like what caused it to happen? I was once spiritually blind until I experimented with certain entheogenic substances. I see the concept of 'god' as very abstract...anywho I dont think there is a need for a creator....I tend to think time is really an illusion. Can there really be a beginng to everything??
It's simply a fact that there has never been a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that has argued for any creationist claim. Doesn't that prove that creationism is unscientific?If creationism is false, then why has NO scientific paper ever disputed it?!?
You need to get to more libraries, methinks. Bible as scientific publication = non sequitur. There’s so many good scientific ones out there that your comment is a slight on all science - it's akin to me calling Darwin’s “Origins” a more important *religious work* than the Bible. Do you see that?
Report Abuse
The Bible is only one of many religious books written by humans. The fact that believers need a ';scientific prove'; for their content, is merely an indication of the weakness in their faith.
Report Abuse
No one serious scientist can argue with a myth that claims, against every evidence, that the world was created when the Jews start counting the time.
Report Abuse
there has never been a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that has disputed or argued against the existence of dragons either...
No. Scientists have better things to write papers on. Like stuff they can collect real, tangible evidence for.
I looked up the scientific method on the Internet for you:
Scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena and acquiring new knowledge, as well as for correcting and integrating previous knowledge. It is based on gathering observable, empirical, measurable evidence, subject to specific principles of reasoning.
No. It just proves that science doesn't have a problem with religion. No one is trying to disprove your god. It's the religious fanatics who put that in peoples head.
Really? Now I see why the United States is declining when someone would ask such as stupid red herring question. CREATIONISM IS NONSENSE GET OVER IT!!!
Creationism has been shown for the fraud it is over and over again.
The United States National Academy of Sciences has stated ';the claims of creation science lack empirical support and cannot be meaningfully tested. These observations lead to two fundamental conclusions: the teaching of evolution should be an integral part of science instruction, and creation science is in fact not science and should not be presented as such in science classes.';[4] and ';Creationism, intelligent design, and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science.';[5] It is viewed as a pseudoscience that does not conform to the scientific method; there are admissions by its proponents that the means of creation cannot be proven.[6] Creation science literature generally consists of compilations of alleged weaknesses in current models of evolution and geology.';
';If creationism is false, then why has NO scientific paper ever disputed it?!?';
Because it is not worth the time of any credible scientist. It's just not a valid theory worth discussing.
Oh stop it. Nobody's THIS stupid.
Because any scientist with the brains of a gnat knows that it useless, and speaking against it in a professional journal would be a complete waste of time. If you want to argue that creationism is scientific, show some effect that it predicts which can be tested by some means. Which would be a challenge, since it can be proven that creationism can predict nothing. You cannot bake a cake if one of the recipe steps is ';Then a miracle happens!';. By the way, evolution is now a proven fact (details on request).
I don't know.... maybe science has better things to do, like finding cures for aids, cancer, leukemia... maybe science is more concerned with prolonging human life rather than the origins of it.
And, no, it doesn't prove that something claimed in a book is scientific. Creationism is just that - something someone claimed. In a book.
No-one needs to argue against creationism; the onus is upon Creationists to prove their position, not the other way around.
';Creationism'; is based on a religious story. It presumes there is a particular god who created the world.. coming to the answer before asking the particular question. The Biblical story of creation is as valid as any of the other thousands of creation stories.
Because it's not falsifiable, which is why it's not a scientific theory in the first place, which is why it has no place in scientific publications.
wait for it
wait for it
wait for it
almost there
Farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrtttt
ahhh.... Great question.
............why even bother anymore?(rolls eyes) *sigh*
There has never been a Creationist claim that had sufficient merit to be tested. It is not scientific because it cannot be tested by predictions it makes.
Creationism is unscientific because it posits a being whose one-time or continued action cannot be reproduced, observed or measured. Science is mostly concerned with observable, measurable or reproducible phenomena which are capable of rational explanation. This is why scientists do not usually bother with ghosts, magic, ESP or ';alien abduction';. None of them are reproducible.
And here's a question for creationists, ';What/who created the creator?'; And who or what created that creator?
Your contention that there has never been a scientific paper disputing creationism is probably erroneous. Creationists do not read the scientific literature, by and large, so they would probably not know. Millions of papers have been published since the 17th century. No-one can read them all.
Someone in a recent court case had to admit he had not read some immunology papers which had been advanced as evidence.
Many scientific papers implicity (but not explicitly) deny some aspects of creationism. However, whether there have been explicit papers or not, scientists from disciplines as diverse as biology and geology have written books disputing the validity of creationism or the truthfulness of several prominent creationists. I cite ';Telling Lies for God'; by geologist Professor Ian Plimer and ';The God Delusion'; by biologist Professor Richard Dawkins.
As far as scientific papers are concerned, scientists have better things to do with their time than to bandy words with what they see as a silly or moronic religious minority. And as a DNA and genetics expert said recently, creationists go for soft targets like school boards and school teachers, not practicing scientists. Practicing scientists generally are too difficult for creationists because they are able to expose the whole mass of error, misinformation and straight out lies that creationism is.
No - not in the least. Creationism is based on a book that could well have been a work of collective fiction during its time and instead has been misunderstood and misused as fact.
The idea of having to teach this so called ';theory'; has been discussed in many scholarly and scientific publications, however.
I am sure there are scientific papers out there disputing creationism. Check out wikipedia's take:
The claim that Creation science is a valid science is disputed. The worldwide scientific community overwhelmingly supports the position that creation science is not a valid science. The United States National Academy of Sciences has stated ';the claims of creation science lack empirical support and cannot be meaningfully tested. These observations lead to two fundamental conclusions: the teaching of evolution should be an integral part of science instruction, and creation science is in fact not science and should not be presented as such in science classes.';[4] and ';Creationism, intelligent design, and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science.';[5] It is viewed as a pseudoscience that does not conform to the scientific method; there are admissions by its proponents that the means of creation cannot be proven.[6] Creation science literature generally consists of compilations of alleged weaknesses in current models of evolution and geology.[
I am a creationist. I'd like to think I'm rational and intelligent. My way of ACCEPTING creationism is this: I consider the Bible to be the word of God, and therefore infallible. I consider scientific ';papers'; and ';theories'; to be the work of mankind, and therefore quite fallible. So there.
Like mentioned by most people, creationism is not a scientific theory thus not for science to talk about. If you want to read theories on the existence of god, which it what creationism relies on, then check of philosophy. There are many philosophical publications on the subject for both the existence of god and the nonexistence of god.
One thing to watch out for with philosophy is that some people love it and others hate it. There is valid reasons for the feeling on both sides, so if someone doesn't like philosophy, I recommend not trying to force them into a debate.
Many have tried to dispel what, for the sake of argument, I will call the ';theory of creationism.'; It is disputed, much like evolution. But if creation could be ';proved'; by human standards, faith would be without effect. For scientific theory to become a law, it has to be tested in a controlled environment. That can't be done with evolution or creation. BTW, I'm a creationist.
I dont belive in creationism....but damn Science dosnt kno ******* everything. Einstein said it best 'religoin without science is blind, and science witout religion is lame' Why dosnt science explain why the universe decided to appear one day somehow from 'nothingness'. So it was the big bang....but was does that really esplain...like what caused it to happen? I was once spiritually blind until I experimented with certain entheogenic substances. I see the concept of 'god' as very abstract...anywho I dont think there is a need for a creator....I tend to think time is really an illusion. Can there really be a beginng to everything??
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Wet Paper Myth-True or False?
Speaking from a scientific perspective, is it true that if you get a liquid(particularly water)on paper, is the paper always going to curl?Wet Paper Myth-True or False?
';paper'; is a very generic term for a flat sheet made out of any number of bonded of fibers. the type of fibers would depend on the curl. the paper money is printed on doesn't curl. don't know if there are experiments on what paper stays flat and what paper curls.Wet Paper Myth-True or False?
Unless you treat the paper carefully, liquid will disrupt the paper fiber mat and lead to some type of distortion.
';paper'; is a very generic term for a flat sheet made out of any number of bonded of fibers. the type of fibers would depend on the curl. the paper money is printed on doesn't curl. don't know if there are experiments on what paper stays flat and what paper curls.Wet Paper Myth-True or False?
Unless you treat the paper carefully, liquid will disrupt the paper fiber mat and lead to some type of distortion.
Poll:- True or False:- You Did buy a Paper Today ?
JoPoll:- True or False:- You Did buy a Paper Today ?
True:)Poll:- True or False:- You Did buy a Paper Today ?
true
i hope never to buy one again have not paid for a paper in over 25 years news does not interest me
false
false
False it comes delivered
Hi true 3 Hugs
true - everyday
false
-drew
Not yet but planning to
False.
No I didn't buy paper today
I have enough of it.
Brought 3 jo...The Sun, The Mirror and the Local Paper !
True.
false
False :)!
False
False :)
False.
False I don't buy papers or watch the news too much depressing stuff going on in the world.
false
True:)Poll:- True or False:- You Did buy a Paper Today ?
true
i hope never to buy one again have not paid for a paper in over 25 years news does not interest me
false
false
False it comes delivered
Hi true 3 Hugs
true - everyday
false
-drew
Not yet but planning to
False.
No I didn't buy paper today
I have enough of it.
Brought 3 jo...The Sun, The Mirror and the Local Paper !
True.
false
False :)!
False
False :)
False.
False I don't buy papers or watch the news too much depressing stuff going on in the world.
false
My HP printer keeps giving a false reading that it is out of paper .?
How do I stop this ? Sometimes just pushing ';OK'; does it -but then it stops after each page and says to refill .My HP printer keeps giving a false reading that it is out of paper .?
Please let me know the model number of your printer,
First try,
Click ';Start'; button on left side of the Desktop to popup Start menu, Click ';Run'; in Start menu to open Run window. Type the word ';SERVICES.MSC'; (without quotes) in ';Open :'; box, click ok button or press Enter key on the keyboard. A Window will pop up with so many Services listed. Find ';PRINT SPOOLER'; service from the list of services. right-click on ';PRINT SPOOLER';---%26gt;';restart';
If this doesnt work.... Click on the following link to open a webpage with title ';HP Photosmart, All-in-One, Deskjet, and PSC Printers - 'Out of Paper' Error Message and the Printer Does Not Pick Up or Feed Paper';
http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/gener鈥?/a>My HP printer keeps giving a false reading that it is out of paper .?
bay new one
this is actually a tray problem. please try communicating with hp engineers on online chat.
probably the sensor that detects the paper in the tray is bad or you can try and resetting the printer back to factory settings. this usually involves a pin or a needle to push in the switch while powering back on the unit. you could always call HP, they have great service.
sounds like it need a bloody good clean out of paper dust-the tiny fibres of paper that you get usually more so off of cheap printer paper. try blowing out the dust but be carefull not to blow it further into the printer
there's a small sensor for every consumable that a printer uses, including paper. look for the sensor that actuates inside the paper tray when nothing is there. make sure that it is mounted properly and functions normally. most sensors like this are a small plastic arm that comes down on top of the paper. make sure there are no obstructions and try flipping it a couple times while the printer is on and see if the printer detects this.
make sure the paper is inserted properly. make sure everything else on the printer is working properly.
my paper keeps disapearing and no one will fess up.
Actually, I had this problem myself. Try unistalling the software, reboot a couple of times, and then reinstall the software.
I guess u do not have any error msg on the printer as such....
Solution
1)Go to control panel --%26gt;%26gt; Printers and Faxes
2)Delete the Icon For u'r Printer
3)Unplug the USB cable ...
4)insert the Printer Disc..
5)When the installation window pops up ,select ';ADD A DEVICE';
Follow the on screen insrtuction....Complete Installation
It Works .....Try It
I would suggest opening the associated application. Normally printers come with a management application that will allow you to see what's goin on with your printer and to do diagnostics. Although it's a bit far fetched, considering ur problem, make sure that ur ink cartridges are calibrated. That is something that should be in the management application as well.
Please let me know the model number of your printer,
First try,
Click ';Start'; button on left side of the Desktop to popup Start menu, Click ';Run'; in Start menu to open Run window. Type the word ';SERVICES.MSC'; (without quotes) in ';Open :'; box, click ok button or press Enter key on the keyboard. A Window will pop up with so many Services listed. Find ';PRINT SPOOLER'; service from the list of services. right-click on ';PRINT SPOOLER';---%26gt;';restart';
If this doesnt work.... Click on the following link to open a webpage with title ';HP Photosmart, All-in-One, Deskjet, and PSC Printers - 'Out of Paper' Error Message and the Printer Does Not Pick Up or Feed Paper';
http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/gener鈥?/a>My HP printer keeps giving a false reading that it is out of paper .?
bay new one
this is actually a tray problem. please try communicating with hp engineers on online chat.
probably the sensor that detects the paper in the tray is bad or you can try and resetting the printer back to factory settings. this usually involves a pin or a needle to push in the switch while powering back on the unit. you could always call HP, they have great service.
sounds like it need a bloody good clean out of paper dust-the tiny fibres of paper that you get usually more so off of cheap printer paper. try blowing out the dust but be carefull not to blow it further into the printer
there's a small sensor for every consumable that a printer uses, including paper. look for the sensor that actuates inside the paper tray when nothing is there. make sure that it is mounted properly and functions normally. most sensors like this are a small plastic arm that comes down on top of the paper. make sure there are no obstructions and try flipping it a couple times while the printer is on and see if the printer detects this.
make sure the paper is inserted properly. make sure everything else on the printer is working properly.
my paper keeps disapearing and no one will fess up.
Actually, I had this problem myself. Try unistalling the software, reboot a couple of times, and then reinstall the software.
I guess u do not have any error msg on the printer as such....
Solution
1)Go to control panel --%26gt;%26gt; Printers and Faxes
2)Delete the Icon For u'r Printer
3)Unplug the USB cable ...
4)insert the Printer Disc..
5)When the installation window pops up ,select ';ADD A DEVICE';
Follow the on screen insrtuction....Complete Installation
It Works .....Try It
I would suggest opening the associated application. Normally printers come with a management application that will allow you to see what's goin on with your printer and to do diagnostics. Although it's a bit far fetched, considering ur problem, make sure that ur ink cartridges are calibrated. That is something that should be in the management application as well.
Is Paper Ceiling Cat a false idol?
Or is it okay to let him in my ceiling? He doesn't bother my kitties.Is Paper Ceiling Cat a false idol?
No, he is an Idol just in paper form. He wont bother you, its just like having a little cross with Jesus Christ on it.
Response to qxzqxzqxz -
Of course ceiling cat made me, who do you think made me, some guy that sits at a computer all day?
Response to VT in an AM handbasket ™
For your information, I don't like cheeseburgers. I love hamburgers.Is Paper Ceiling Cat a false idol?
Where as I, Ninja Ceiling Cat represent the vengeful part of CC, Paper CC represents his creative flair. (And what a creative flair he has, just look at us!)
Ohai,
Paper Ceiling Cat is bad. srsly. He eetz ur cheezburgr. Only get one original Ceiling Cat
Kthnxbai
only if you make it a false idol...
There's a stain on my ceiling.
I named it Spot.
Maybe...what is it for?
Hmm... There is a wad of mashed up paper that has been stuck on my ceiling for the past eight years. =\ I wonder...
If the ceiling cat created everything, wouldn't he have also created the paper ceiling cat?
My question is is paper ceiling cat the same cat as ceiling cat?
No, he is an Idol just in paper form. He wont bother you, its just like having a little cross with Jesus Christ on it.
Response to qxzqxzqxz -
Of course ceiling cat made me, who do you think made me, some guy that sits at a computer all day?
Response to VT in an AM handbasket ™
For your information, I don't like cheeseburgers. I love hamburgers.Is Paper Ceiling Cat a false idol?
Where as I, Ninja Ceiling Cat represent the vengeful part of CC, Paper CC represents his creative flair. (And what a creative flair he has, just look at us!)
Ohai,
Paper Ceiling Cat is bad. srsly. He eetz ur cheezburgr. Only get one original Ceiling Cat
Kthnxbai
only if you make it a false idol...
There's a stain on my ceiling.
I named it Spot.
Maybe...what is it for?
Hmm... There is a wad of mashed up paper that has been stuck on my ceiling for the past eight years. =\ I wonder...
If the ceiling cat created everything, wouldn't he have also created the paper ceiling cat?
My question is is paper ceiling cat the same cat as ceiling cat?
HP4550DN - Paper Jam Middle Draw - false message. Help?
I have a networked Hewlett Packard HP4550DN printer. It keeps reporting a paper jam in the middle drawer. I have examined it and found no paper. I have vacuumed up any toner in case that is the cause. I have also inspected the fuser area around the back. No trace of paper.
Does anyone have a clue as to what I can check next or what might be causing the errors? I have been in contact with HP but the matter continues.HP4550DN - Paper Jam Middle Draw - false message. Help?
Most HP printer will give a ';Paper Jam'; error for a drawer if the printer is unable to pick the paper up and feed it. (I know - should say something like ';Can't feed'; - not ';paper jam';, but I don't write the error message) :-P
Usual cause of that is that one (or more) of the pick up rollers has worn down and needs to be replaced. I don't have any of the 4550 a this site (4500, but no 4550), so I can't tell you the exact location of the roller, but it is usually about 3/4'; in diameter and about 1 1/2'; to 2'; long. Slides over a pin in the body of the printer above the paper tray.
If you have multiple trays, there is probably an identical roller above each of the trays. You might try seeing if you can swap the roller with one from another tray. If the error moves with the roller, you have found the problem.
I have also seen ';cheap paper'; cause the problem. As it sounds like that has been on-going, the paper in the tray has probably been replaced or replenished - but it can't hurt to suggest replacing it.
Best guesses I have...
Good luckHP4550DN - Paper Jam Middle Draw - false message. Help?
Hi there!!
I have had some similar problems here at work with our 4500n printer. I had to call for a service man.. The problem was some parts inside our printer that was worn out..
There may be a small piece of paper stuck somewhere in the paper path. There may also be a buildup of toner and paper dust somewhere. These printers need to be cleaned once in a while by taking them apart. We used Technology Unlimited in Seattle and they did a great job. Good luck!
The sensor that detects the paper jam is probably defective, and might need replacing. This is a common problem. You should probably call for a repair person to take a look at it.
it might not help but try the other drawers as well and try to look if there is another way to open the printer to find jammed paper (in your hp help on your comp-there should be help on how to release jammed paper on mine there was a back openning i didn't know about and there it was)
I get the paper jam message now and then. Often it is because the paper in my input tray is not feeding properly for some reason, or I forgot to load it.windows web hosting
Does anyone have a clue as to what I can check next or what might be causing the errors? I have been in contact with HP but the matter continues.HP4550DN - Paper Jam Middle Draw - false message. Help?
Most HP printer will give a ';Paper Jam'; error for a drawer if the printer is unable to pick the paper up and feed it. (I know - should say something like ';Can't feed'; - not ';paper jam';, but I don't write the error message) :-P
Usual cause of that is that one (or more) of the pick up rollers has worn down and needs to be replaced. I don't have any of the 4550 a this site (4500, but no 4550), so I can't tell you the exact location of the roller, but it is usually about 3/4'; in diameter and about 1 1/2'; to 2'; long. Slides over a pin in the body of the printer above the paper tray.
If you have multiple trays, there is probably an identical roller above each of the trays. You might try seeing if you can swap the roller with one from another tray. If the error moves with the roller, you have found the problem.
I have also seen ';cheap paper'; cause the problem. As it sounds like that has been on-going, the paper in the tray has probably been replaced or replenished - but it can't hurt to suggest replacing it.
Best guesses I have...
Good luckHP4550DN - Paper Jam Middle Draw - false message. Help?
Hi there!!
I have had some similar problems here at work with our 4500n printer. I had to call for a service man.. The problem was some parts inside our printer that was worn out..
There may be a small piece of paper stuck somewhere in the paper path. There may also be a buildup of toner and paper dust somewhere. These printers need to be cleaned once in a while by taking them apart. We used Technology Unlimited in Seattle and they did a great job. Good luck!
The sensor that detects the paper jam is probably defective, and might need replacing. This is a common problem. You should probably call for a repair person to take a look at it.
it might not help but try the other drawers as well and try to look if there is another way to open the printer to find jammed paper (in your hp help on your comp-there should be help on how to release jammed paper on mine there was a back openning i didn't know about and there it was)
I get the paper jam message now and then. Often it is because the paper in my input tray is not feeding properly for some reason, or I forgot to load it.
True or False: You played with paper-dolls?
If True, share your experience please.True or False: You played with paper-dolls?
Sure did, but I've moved on up with the plastic blow-up kind now.True or False: You played with paper-dolls?
Thanks, but I wish they could invent one that loves back.
Paper, no... Inflatable.. not telling.
True, I used to have The Little Mermaid paperdoll set as a kid and some Japanese paper doll.
I played with other's paper doll's as well and a younger cousin of mine has a magnetic doll which I play with whenever I'm at her house lol.
absolutely true we were to poor to afford the real thing
True! When I was a girl in the 70s. I loved them. But sometimes the paper tabs would rip and the clothes wouldn't stay on well.
true... i loved them as a child. i remember my grandmother used to send them to me and i would cut them out and the clothes and play with them until they fell apart..... good memories ..
true. where im from my parents couldnt afford to buy real dolls so i made mines from paper
False
True... I played with paper dolls, the little tabs that held the clothes in place worked fine the first few times you used them, but over time they wore out. It then seems to me that they developed a type that was plastic of sorts and the static would cause the clothes to stick. I loved changing out outfits, hair styles, and shoes.. you could get lost in your own little world, and the best thing, they didn't take up much space! You could carry them with you on road trips... Worked well since I'd get motion sickness if I tried to read...
false
True I use to play with them with my sister when we were kids. Until dad saw me playing with them with her. And he said boys do not play with dolls. When he wasn't around me and my sister continued doing it though.
false..
false
True! I used to love those things. Had such an imagination lol all my paper dolls had such exciting lives lol, i think they were like movie stars and stuff and the guy paper dolls were like the annoying big brothers lol. :D I really liked playing with paper dolls when i was young, i remember enjoying the clothing line the most, so i was always interested in being a fashion designer from a really young age, but i never got into in the end after heh. :)
true! i loved to put all the different paper clothes on them, and different hair styles.
no
Sure did, but I've moved on up with the plastic blow-up kind now.True or False: You played with paper-dolls?
Thanks, but I wish they could invent one that loves back.
Report Abuse
Paper, no... Inflatable.. not telling.
True, I used to have The Little Mermaid paperdoll set as a kid and some Japanese paper doll.
I played with other's paper doll's as well and a younger cousin of mine has a magnetic doll which I play with whenever I'm at her house lol.
absolutely true we were to poor to afford the real thing
True! When I was a girl in the 70s. I loved them. But sometimes the paper tabs would rip and the clothes wouldn't stay on well.
true... i loved them as a child. i remember my grandmother used to send them to me and i would cut them out and the clothes and play with them until they fell apart..... good memories ..
true. where im from my parents couldnt afford to buy real dolls so i made mines from paper
False
True... I played with paper dolls, the little tabs that held the clothes in place worked fine the first few times you used them, but over time they wore out. It then seems to me that they developed a type that was plastic of sorts and the static would cause the clothes to stick. I loved changing out outfits, hair styles, and shoes.. you could get lost in your own little world, and the best thing, they didn't take up much space! You could carry them with you on road trips... Worked well since I'd get motion sickness if I tried to read...
false
True I use to play with them with my sister when we were kids. Until dad saw me playing with them with her. And he said boys do not play with dolls. When he wasn't around me and my sister continued doing it though.
false..
false
True! I used to love those things. Had such an imagination lol all my paper dolls had such exciting lives lol, i think they were like movie stars and stuff and the guy paper dolls were like the annoying big brothers lol. :D I really liked playing with paper dolls when i was young, i remember enjoying the clothing line the most, so i was always interested in being a fashion designer from a really young age, but i never got into in the end after heh. :)
true! i loved to put all the different paper clothes on them, and different hair styles.
no
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)